Horse Sense (and Sensibility)

About Stephanie

Stephanie L. Church, Editor-in-Chief of The Horse, received a B.A. in Journalism and Equestrian Studies from Averett College in Danville, Va., and has worked in five positions at the magazine since 1999. Her equine background is in eventing, and she enjoys photography, cooking, cycling, swimming, and traveling in her free time.

First of all, there's no need to panic. Be smart? Yes. Be aware? Yes. Panic? An emphatic "no."

Pockets of the horse industry have wrestled with a neurologic equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) outbreak before, and they have recovered and gone back to business as usual. The current state of quarantined barns and hospitals and smattering of canceled shows is inconvenient, expensive, and frustrating, but these preventive measures are necessary and will be worth the trouble in the long run. We don't want to see more horses in additional states affected.

This outbreak can cause our hearts to palpitate because neurologic illness in a horse is ugly, and how these viruses work and are spread can be confusing and seemingly unpredictable. However, there is good news: There are some very smart/savvy veterinarians treating neurologic horses and catching cases early. Also, if owners with horses that attended the Ogden show monitor these animals (and any in-contact horses) vigilantly for fever and other signs of illness; if they work closely with their veterinarians; and if they stay put on their farms, the situation will become a nonissue.

This particular neurologic EHV-1 outbreak is interesting to me because it's much more high-profile than the others I've followed in the 12 years I've been at The Horse. I find myself asking why.

  • Is it that the first-confirmed cases all have a particular show in common, so the situation is "relatable" for owners ("That could have very easily been me.")?
  • Is it the widespread use of social media, with a steady stream of posts on Facebook and Twitter (some accurate, some not)?
  • Is it because there are confirmed cases in multiple states (we're not just talking about a few adjacent counties)?

Regardless of what it is about this outbreak that has people on edge, simply brushing up on your EHV-1 knowledge is important, if it does nothing more than calm your nerves and give you a reference point for disease caused by the virus, should you ever encounter it. Our news editor, Erica, has spent many hours on the phone this week with veterinarians and state departments of agriculture collecting facts to educate readers. If you haven't already seen them, check out these two stories for a recap on EHV-1 and how it manifests (The Top 5 Things You Need to Know about Neurologic EHV-1, and Equine Herpesvirus-1: Minimizing Costs, Dispelling Myths). And here's an article we ran a few years back on the different types of EHV and what veterinarians have learned about them. 

In reflecting on the past week of industry reaction, here are some things that I feel should be pondered:

  • An outbreak of neurologic EHV-1 doesn't mean that someone has been irresponsible. When case reports are popping up here and there, it's in our caring and passionate nature as horse owners to want to place blame and point out an error or lapse as a cause. Several veterinarians said that the source of the illness might be a subclinical shedder, meaning a horse that didn't even show clinical signs of a disease--and still might appear completely healthy--might have simply cleared his nasal passages while being led down a barn aisle at the Ogden show. Similarly, owners whose horses were exposed (without the owners' knowledge) to a shedder may have brought their normal-acting horses home with no awareness that these animals may have been exposed. Any speculation about irresponsible management is unnecessary and unfortunate.
  • Preventive measures go a long way in reducing spread and expense. A veterinarian whose hospital was quarantined in a past neurologic EHV-1 outbreak mentioned this week that the ordeal cost his clinic more than a million dollars. Being responsible is, in fact, expensive, and by keeping your resident horses home; by watching any that may have been transported to your farm recently (and you're not sure their point of origin) and separating them from your resident herd; and by taking temperatures daily of horses that attended the Ogden show or have been exposed to those travelers, you can prevent further spread. As a bit of a biosecurity geek, I have compiled information on preventing disease spread in the past.
  • Historically, there's been no centralized location for collating EHV-1 neurologic cases, although the USDA has begun to keep a list of cases. Until that list went live, Dr. Scott Weese, a veterinarian at the University of Guelph's Ontario Veterinary College, was keeping track. By the way, he and his colleagues update a fascinating infectious disease blog that I encourage you to visit. Since EHV-1 neurologic disease is not a reportable disease in every state or province, gathering such information can be difficult. Watch the USDA site for domestic updates and the EquID blog for Canada numbers. The AAEP has some great information on their resource page. And Erica will do her best to get the most up-to-date, accurate information that she can find for her story updates.
  • Keeping that in mind, work closely with your veterinarian to assess your horse's risk in light of reports. A "confirmed" or "suspect" case can mean several things. As a veterinarian friend pointed out to me yesterday, case counts have the potential to be confusing and/or misleading, because a confirmed case might mean a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis on a horse that exhibited neurologic signs. Or, as another example, it might mean a horse in proximity to other cases tested positive for EHV-1 without showing any neurologic signs. (We've tried to designate in our updates if the horses were neuro cases.) And, as at least one veterinary source has pointed out this week, EHV-1 is a very common virus to find in horses, and the majority of horses are exposed early in life and become latently infected (they don't show signs of illness) for their lifetimes. My friend posed the question of whether any of the reported positives could be latent infections that simply happened to be tested because of their proximity to the current outbreak ... and maybe they just got over an EHV-1 respiratory infection ... or recently had an EHV-1 abortion unrelated to the current outbreak ... or maybe they have other causes of neurologic signs. Confusing, yes? There's also the issue of where these cases are--is it even a county near you? This is why working with your veterinarian is so very important. He or she has the experience and insight to advise you on what precautions need to be taken, given the case information available.
  • By reporting on this continually, we're giving horse owners coordinates on what's happening. My goal is to help eliminate the hysteria. The daily updates have been worth it to me if just one person realizes it might be a good idea to keep an eye on a recent equine addition to his or her farm, separating him from their resident herd if they're not sure where the horse has been. Better safe, as they say. It's also worth it if one person who's panicking reads our reports and realizes, "Oh, my horses never leave the farm, and nobody has been out to an affected premises has visited my horses. We're fine." My hope is to educate. In that light, we're having a live webinar on Tuesday at 8:00 p.m. Eastern that I hope you'll attend.

I heard that a conference call Thursday for veterinarians about the current EHV-1 situation garnered more than 250 attendees. Veterinarians are educating themselves on how cases in the current outbreak are presenting, and they're brushing up on case treatment methods, and that's great to hear. We've got a caring, well-informed population of equine veterinarians, and that inspires me daily.

So, considering there's a veterinarian population wielding the latest EHV-1 knowledge, a horse-owning population armed with accurate information and being vigilant about transport and watching for fevers, and the inevitable quieting of this outbreak as biosecurity measures are taken, this thing could be done soon. There's really no reason to panic.

Your turn: Why do you think this EHV-1 outbreak has been talked about more than other outbreaks in recent years? Have you been touched by this outbreak?

Comments

Internet accessibility is bringing the subject to the forefront and people make a quick judgement before getting all the facts and are not willing to change their opinion as all the facts come out. People are scared if the virus is in the next state, afraid to go out trailriding, even though there is no evidence of the virus having spread from those connected to the Utah event. They don't understand that most horses have already been exposed when they were young. This outbreak is widespread, horse owners that were at the event have been notified and are keeping their horses isolated. People are afraid of the vet, the shoer, etc, who have not even had any contact in any way, are miles away even, from any horses with the virus. Doesn't that seem irrational?



kathy 21 May 2011 1:57 PM

Thanks for your comments, Kathy. Yes, with the notifications that occurred and compliance with instructions to quarantine, there should be no reason to worry. How many horses are exposed early in life and might be latently infected is one that I do think needs to be emphasized more. I'm hoping someone will ask the vets about that (and its significance in the current scenario) in the webinar Tuesday night if they don't already discuss it in their presentation.



Stephanie 21 May 2011 11:53 PM

For me, it is literally closer to home than previous outbreaks - I live in Utah.  I also was the organizer of a dressage clinic scheduled for this weekend, so I had to make the decision about whether to cancel within hours of first hearing about the outbreak.  I called the state veterinarian to ask for his advice, and when he recommended canceling, that's what I did.



Ellen 22 May 2011 11:24 AM

Ellen, that's great that you contacted your state veterinarian for advice. It sounds like together you came to a sound decision based on the information that the officials and you had. Thank you for your responsible actions.



Stephanie 23 May 2011 10:57 AM

I've been following this out break, trying to figure out WHY THE OVERREACTION. Here in No. California, arenas have been closed, shows cancelled, riders advised not to trail ride. Most of these activities have nothing to do with cutting horses, many not even involving Quarter Horses.

I understand & expect quarantine of exposed and potentially exposed horses, but Arabs, Morgans?



Colleen 23 May 2011 11:02 AM

Hi Colleen, those are very good questions. If show/event organizers have spoken with veterinarians/vet officials and determined that the risk of horses who may have been in contact with infected horses (no matter the breed) coming to a gathering/show/clinic/etc. outweighs the benefit of having the event, then cancellations happen. I don't consider that overreacting, if they're making the decision with an informed veterinarian. I do believe there are *plenty* of instances of overreaction out there, indeed, but as long as organizers are working with veterinarians, their decisions will be sound and individuals will be responding to their level of comfort. Horse owners deciding whether they'll attend events can work with their own veterinarians at the barn level to determine their risk and respond accordingly.



STEPHANIE 23 May 2011 11:23 AM

I live in Pa. Is there any concern for people here on the east coast to stop traveling to local shows or should we ALL stay home "just in case".  No cases near me so are we safe or not?  Concerned in Pa.



Sue 23 May 2011 1:32 PM

I hope more information comes forward about the genetics of this strain and also helpful and trustworthy information about a possible booster vaccine that could protect horses in the future from this neurological strain.  With so much talk about vaccinations, over vaccinating and under vaccinating.  I just wish vets would be more forward with local advisories.  Seems like owners are becoming more adverse to vaccinations because of the suspicion that vets are upselling and possibly reccomending based on economics not health.  It is hard to get good practical vaccination information if you want to be involved in making this difficult decision.



calida 25 May 2011 11:31 AM

I think another reason this outbreak has created so much concern is that it was identified after exposed horses had left the facility and dispersed to multiple states. In my memory most other outbreaks have been identified and quarantines established where the neurologic form was first identified.



Carol 27 May 2011 4:09 PM

I SO want to go trail riding! But my riding partner is an RN and she won't budge. So I've really had to do some considering on this topic.

If I calculated correctly… Based on today's APHIS update, 14% of the horses attending the Ogden event contracted EHV-1 (58 of 415).  1% of those exposed on a secondary/tertiary basis contracted it (17 of 1635). Fatality rates are 15.5% and 11.8% respectively in these groups (comparable to 5-30% fatality rates for Legionnaires disease in people).

Now... let's consider if this were 415 high schoolers attending a national event and 9 kids who attended died within 2 weeks of going home. Then, 2 more of their classmates who hadn’t even attended the event caught it and died before a month had even passed. Do you think we’d be closing schools? Cancelling extracurricular events, especially between schools?

I’m convinced… If not riding for a couple more weeks means that I can eliminate one risk to me riding my 6 yr old horse for 20 more years… I’m in…



Caroline 28 May 2011 12:34 AM

So much media hype and misinformation.  By now every horse that was in contact with the virus at Ogden should either be sick or unaffected.  Time for life to go on.  Get your horses shots and none of this would happen...



Bev 29 May 2011 11:26 PM

Bev, I'd like to point out that the neurological form of EHV-1, there is not a shot that works against it. This is not something that can be done in your spring and fall vaccines.



Cathy 31 May 2011 5:42 PM

I still don't get it.  Education is provided and still people are overreacting.  Horses are dying from other diseases and no one is in a panic.  EIA still rears it's ugly head but we go on.  We worry more about these occasional outbreaks than the fact that our children are being horribly injured and killed because we refuse to make them wear helmets.  I think we have our priorities all mixed up.



Susan 02 Jun 2011 2:25 AM

Pingback from  Sunday Links : EVENTING NATION



30 Mar 2012 11:56 PM